A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their website, leading to an encroachment with a Exclusive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such areas are issue to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced within the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-high water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, a picture which has due to the fact come to be emblematic of your depth with the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and authorized options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier noted the businessman had Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really various Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.